Drunkard's Walk Forums

I just put an image of the ISS into the Wiki's database, so I thought taking a run at the accompanying article might be a good idea...

====== International Space Station ======

===== History =====

The **International Space Station** (ISS) is the last operational piece of unenhanced manned space hardware left in the solar system. Completed in 2010, it is administered by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs on behalf of its member space agencies, and maintained by Project Artemis.

//early history, up to 2007 - lift and abstract from Wikipedia//

//history 2007-2013 - the collective needs to make up something//

The International Space Station was always seen as "one of NASA's projects" in the US space community. When TSAB eclipsed NASA in the early 2010s, support for American involvement in the ISS waned, purely for political reasons. Finally, TSAB used the near-miss of the station by the //[[ships:Calling Port]// in January 2013 as a pretext to pull out of the ISS altogether, and the CSA quickly followed their lead. The ESA, the FKA, JAXA, and the other space agencies did their best to take up the slack, but apathy about continued hardtech space exploration in their home nations' governments meant they were unable to secure enough funds to properly maintain the station. In early 2014, they turned to the Fen, hoping to find a "white knight".

They found one in the [[gazetteer:companies:Stellvia Corporation]. When Project Artemis took over NASA's space operations and facilities, they also took responsibility for maintaining the ISS. Artemis respects the unique nature of the station's technology and uses absolutely no handwavium in this maintenance.

===== Structure =====

The International Space Station is unique in being the only space station constructed purely with mundane materials and techniques. Hard Science has no room for handwaving.

//lift and abstract details from Wikipedia//

While a very few tourists visited the International Space Station before the 'wave, they were always underfoot. The station is neither equipped nor intended for tourism, and even the most bare-bones Fen station is more luxurious than the ISS anyway.

===== Activities =====

//lift and abstract list from Wikipedia//

---

Edit: For those not up on their alphabet soup:

• NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  
• CSA: Canadian Space Agency
  
• ESA: European Space Agency
  
• FKA: ??????????? ??????????? ?????????
  
• JAXA: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  
•  
  

 
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012

Hm. Some thoughts:

* Construction ought to run as planned through to 2010. Things can change quickly in the wave, but not for NASA.

* The last Shuttle flight (STS-133) puts the ISS in a precarious state even without TSAB's machinations. Without the Shuttle to resupply and provide an
orbital boost, the station's utility drops rather dramatically (see the period after STS-107). There might be room for one or two dramatic
"rescues" of the station from an ignominous Mir-style end by one group of fen or another. (My vote for this would be Rockhounds or the Blue Blazers,
if we want to go with big-name groups.)

* It occurs that in the Artemis period that some of the lessons learned from Stellvia's construction would work well with ISS. After all, the idea of using
Shuttle tanks as space station modules isn't that out there, and Artemis *did* inherit all of the old Shuttle hardware...
Mr. Fnord interdimensional man of mystery

FenWiki - Your One-Stop Shop for Fenspace Information

"I. Drink. Your. NERDRAGE!"

Quote:* Construction ought to run as planned through to 2010. Things can change quickly in the wave, but not for NASA.

Yeah. There's also the "Hard Science has no room for handwaving" attitude that we've seen in the Miranda entry; the scientists aren't likely to want an untested substance anywhere near their experiments.

Quote:* The last Shuttle flight (STS-133) puts the ISS in a precarious state even without TSAB's machinations. Without the Shuttle to resupply and provide an orbital boost, the station's utility drops rather dramatically (see the period after STS-107). There might be room for one or two dramatic "rescues" of the station from an ignominous Mir-style end by one group of fen or another. (My vote for this would be Rockhounds or the Blue Blazers, if we want to go with big-name groups.)

After 2010, the Multipurpose Laboratory Module should be able to take care of altitude adjustments... but there's still the question of ferrying experiments to and from the ISS. Hmmmmm...

Quote:* It occurs that in the Artemis period that some of the lessons learned from Stellvia's construction would work well with ISS. After all, the idea of using Shuttle tanks as space station modules isn't that out there, and Artemis *did* inherit all of the old Shuttle hardware...

Again, "Hard Science has no room for handwaving". Stellvia isn't completely 'wavium-free - Noah prefers hardtech but isn't a damnfool about it.

So... take two, with quite a bit of data raided from the Wikipedia ISS entry:

---

====== International Space Station ======

The **International Space Station** (ISS) is the last operational piece of unenhanced manned space hardware left in the solar system. Completed in 2010, it is administered by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (OOSA) on behalf of its member space agencies from Europe, Asia, and South America, and maintained by Project Artemis.

The ISS routinely orbits Earth at an altitude of 400 km. While the station is able to orbit at an altitude as low as 278 km, it no longer does so because of atmospheric drag concerns. The ISS can orbit at an altitude of 460 km, but the Soyuz capsules operated by the FKA for crew rotation have an operational ceiling of 425 km.

The station has a pressurized volume of approximately 1,000 cubic meters. Assembly began in November 1998 with the launch of the //Zarya// storage module, and finished in 2010 with the installation of the //Cupola// direct-observation module. The ISS has a rated crew of three.

===== History =====

The design of the ISS grew from a collection of proposed national space stations - the projects that would have built NASA's //Space Station Freedom//, the FKA's //Mir-2//, the ESA's //Columbus//, and JAXA's //Kibou// experiment module during the "space race" of the mid-twentieth century all contributed parts of their respective station plans to what was originally called //Space Station Alpha//. NASA brought the CSA into the project by requesting they build the station's main manipulators, //Canadarm2// and //Canada Hand//. These five space agencies signed the Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement in January 1998.

Module //Zarya// was launched in November 1998. After the //Unity// and //Zvezda// mudules were added, the station's first crew boarded the ISS in November 2000. The station has been inhabited ever since.

The loss of the original Shuttle //Columbia// in February 2003 caused a two-and-a-half year grounding of the Shuttle fleet, interrupted by a single flight of //Atlantis// in mid-2005 to carry out an urgent logistics mission to the ISS. This slowed construction of the station considerably.

The relatively sudden appearance of [[gazetteer:handwaviumtart|Handwavium] in early 2008 lead to discussions amongst the member agencies of the Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement as to whether they would make use of the new technologies. It was eventually decided that the station's construction was too far along for changes at such a late date, the technology was still unproven, and "Hard Science has no room for handwaving." because of this decision, the ISS does not incorporate any handwavium technology.

The installation of the //Cupola// in late 2010 completed construction of the ISS. This was marked with indifference; so many other stations were already functioning (including the TSAB station //Benjamin Franklin//) that the achievement was treated in most circles with less respect than it deserved.

//history 2010-2013 - does the collective want to make up something?//

The International Space Station was always seen as "one of NASA's projects" in the US space community. When TSAB eclipsed NASA in the early 2010s, support for American involvement in the ISS waned, purely for political reasons. Finally, TSAB used the //[[ships:Calling Port]//'s near-miss of the ISS in January 2013 as a pretext to pull out of the ISS altogether, and the CSA quickly followed their lead, both agencies selling their portions of the station to the European Space Agency and JAXA. The ESA, the FKA, JAXA, and the other space agencies did their best to take up the slack, but apathy about continued hardtech space exploration in their home nations' governments and the expense of buying out the portions of the ISS previously owned by NASA and the CSA meant they were unable to properly maintain the station. Turning over full ownership of the ISS to the OOSA bought the station a few months of extra operational time as many of the world's other space agencies contributed to its upkeep, but the UN's pockets have never been very deep. In early 2014, they turned to the Fen, hoping to find a "white knight".

They found one in the [[gazetteer:companies:Stellvia Corporation]. When Project Artemis took over NASA's space operations and facilities, they also took responsibility for maintaining the ISS. Artemis respects the unique nature of the station's technology and uses absolutely no handwavium in this maintenance.

In addition to the station's maintenance, Project Artemis also ressurected the NASA Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program. They purchased the plans and prototypes of the //K-1 Vehicle// (which had been mothballed before launch in October 2007) from Rocketplane Kistler, and subcontracted completion of the first functional ship to the VVS in June 2014. That first K-1 was completed with handwavium technology, and its computer system has developed an AI whose personality is based on the character Keiichi Morisato from //Ah My Goddess//; this is believed to be a result of R. [[chars:Sora Hasegawa]'s involvement in the project interacting with the K-1's model designation. The K-1 series serves as the primary ISS resupply ships, making regular runs between Baikonur, the Guiana Space Centre, the Tanegashima Space Center, and the station.

===== Structure =====

The International Space Station is unique in being the only existing space station constructed purely with mundane materials and techniques.

There are fourteen pressurized modules in the ISS. In order of installation, they are:

* //Zarya// (storage module)
* //Unity// (berthing hub)
* //Zvezda// (station service module: main living quarters, environmental systems, attitude & orbit control, dock)
* //Destiny// (laboratory, environmental systems, living quarters)
* //Quest// (primary airlock)
* //Pirs// (dock, spacesuit storage space)
* //Harmony// (the "utility hub" of the ISS - electrical power, data bus, module berthing hub)
* //Columbus// (research facility)
* //Kibou// Experiment Logistics Module (experiment storage)
* //Kibou// Japanese Pressurized Module (laboratory)
* Multipurpose Laboratory Module (laboratory, docking and cargo logistics, crew lounge, attitude control system)
* Docking Cargo Module (dock, cargo storage)
* Node 3 (life support, module berthing hub)
* //Cupola// (observatory - aimed at Earth)

The //ExPRESS Logistics Carrier//, deployed to the ISS in late 2009, is an unpressurized module that supports experiments conducted in the vacuum of space.

While a very few tourists visited the International Space Station before the 'wave, they were always underfoot. The station is neither equipped nor intended for tourism, and even the most bare-bones Fen station is more luxurious than the ISS anyway.

===== Activities =====

With the Fen presence in space handling many of the original purposes of the ISS, the OOSA has tightened the station's focus to concentrate solely on scientific research that requires microgravity or direct observation of Earth. The complete absence of handwavium on the station reassures many scientists of the reliability of the data obtained during the experiments carried out aboard the ISS.

The station's main fields of research include biomedical research, biotechnology, fluid physics, materials science, quantum physics, astronomy, cosmology, and meteorology. The long-term goals of this research are to develop new ways to treat diseases and more efficient methods of producing materials, to take more accurate scientific measurements than are possible on Earth, and to extend mankind's understanding of the Universe. (Originally, the ISS was also involved in developing the technology necessary for human-based space and planetary exploration and colonization. Fen research into handwavium technology has made this part of the station's remit moot.)

---

Comments, suggestions, brickbats, etc...?

 
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012

Quote:Again, "Hard Science has no room for handwaving". Stellvia isn't completely 'wavium-free - Noah prefers hardtech but isn't a damnfool about it.

Not quite what I meant. Stellvia, even with the handwaving, proves that you *can* outfit a Shuttle tank as a perfectly workable space station module with only minimum difficulty, and since Artemis now owns all the hardware including any spare ETs, it wouldn't be out of line to outfit a tank and attach it in order to provide more operating room. Granted, it'd have to be moved into place using wavetech, but the interior could be kitted out entirely as hardtech.
Mr. Fnord interdimensional man of mystery

FenWiki - Your One-Stop Shop for Fenspace Information

"I. Drink. Your. NERDRAGE!"

Hmmmmm... something for a later addendum to the article, then.

I'm going to add that second draft to the wiki, where people can play with it a bit more easily than we can here...
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012