+- Drunkard's Walk Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums)
+-- Forum: General (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: The Other People's Game Writing Forum (/showthread.php?tid=3451)
The Other People's Game Writing Forum - Epsilon - 12-09-2010
Given that there is less than twenty topic in it and the last post in it was in August (and that is one post, the last post before that was June) I think it might be an experimental failure. I'd suggest putting the topics back in general discussion, since obviously they are not going to overwhelm the regular chatter at that rate.
---------------
Epsilon
- Bob Schroeck - 12-09-2010
I think you're probably right. I'll give it a day or so for anyone who wants to lodge an objection, but if there're none, I'll do that very thing.
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.
- Morganite - 12-09-2010
... Are we short on real estate? '.'
-Morgan.
- Epsilon - 12-09-2010
It's more that, at the moment the discussion of such topic are ghettoized. If I wanted to start a discussion about a weird new rpg or something I'd have to put it there. Nobody goes there, so nobody is likely to see or respond to it. The purpose of having a seperate forum is to foster discussion about the topic of that forum or prevent the discussion of a single topic from overwhelming the parent forums (thus the existence of the politics forum). If the discussion isn't happening either way, why keep the forum open and force people to go there?
----------------
Epsilon
- Bob Schroeck - 12-11-2010
No real objects in 40 hours or so... Okay, then, say buhbye to "Other People's Game Writing".
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.