Posts: 27,023
Threads: 2,141
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
13
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
05-03-2026, 11:57 AM
Thanks, Geth.
Posts: 27,023
Threads: 2,141
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
13
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
05-06-2026, 09:07 AM
(04-27-2026, 10:12 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Ah, jeeze, I just noticed something we've all overlooked. A new user by the name of "TheCajunPhoenix" has been systematically miscorrecting the possessive form of nouns that end in "s", from s-apostrophe to s-apostrophe-s. <sigh> Something for me to track down and fix, along with giving him a warning.
EDIT: Okay, it wasn't as bad as I thought at first glance, maybe a half dozen such changes in all. And honestly, different references say different things (including one that has different rules for nouns that are plural vs singular nouns that just happen to end in "S"), so he's probably just following the way he was taught. However, a lot of our style descends from the AP Stylebook, and we've been handling this exactly as the AP lays it out. Anyway, I undid those half-dozen or so cases, and left him a friendly note about it.
User:TheCajunPhoenix is now On Notice for ignoring a mod (specifically, ignoring Bob.) They tried to make an edit that was nothing but adding an "S" to a possessive that ended with an s.
Posts: 1,807
Threads: 7
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
3
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
05-06-2026, 03:57 PM
(05-06-2026, 09:07 AM)robkelk Wrote: (04-27-2026, 10:12 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Ah, jeeze, I just noticed something we've all overlooked. A new user by the name of "TheCajunPhoenix" has been systematically miscorrecting the possessive form of nouns that end in "s", from s-apostrophe to s-apostrophe-s. <sigh> Something for me to track down and fix, along with giving him a warning.
EDIT: Okay, it wasn't as bad as I thought at first glance, maybe a half dozen such changes in all. And honestly, different references say different things (including one that has different rules for nouns that are plural vs singular nouns that just happen to end in "S"), so he's probably just following the way he was taught. However, a lot of our style descends from the AP Stylebook, and we've been handling this exactly as the AP lays it out. Anyway, I undid those half-dozen or so cases, and left him a friendly note about it.
User:TheCajunPhoenix is now On Notice for ignoring a mod (specifically, ignoring Bob.) They tried to make an edit that was nothing but adding an "S" to a possessive that ended with an s.
On that note, how do we respond to this proposal to modify our style rules:
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Special:Mo...odid=25632
Said user has also confirmed they want the rules changed here:
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Special:Mo...odid=25633
Posts: 27,023
Threads: 2,141
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
13
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
05-06-2026, 05:10 PM
(05-06-2026, 03:57 PM)GethN7 Wrote: (05-06-2026, 09:07 AM)robkelk Wrote: (04-27-2026, 10:12 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Ah, jeeze, I just noticed something we've all overlooked. A new user by the name of "TheCajunPhoenix" has been systematically miscorrecting the possessive form of nouns that end in "s", from s-apostrophe to s-apostrophe-s. <sigh> Something for me to track down and fix, along with giving him a warning.
EDIT: Okay, it wasn't as bad as I thought at first glance, maybe a half dozen such changes in all. And honestly, different references say different things (including one that has different rules for nouns that are plural vs singular nouns that just happen to end in "S"), so he's probably just following the way he was taught. However, a lot of our style descends from the AP Stylebook, and we've been handling this exactly as the AP lays it out. Anyway, I undid those half-dozen or so cases, and left him a friendly note about it.
User:TheCajunPhoenix is now On Notice for ignoring a mod (specifically, ignoring Bob.) They tried to make an edit that was nothing but adding an "S" to a possessive that ended with an s.
On that note, how do we respond to this proposal to modify our style rules:
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Special:Mo...odid=25632
Said user has also confirmed they want the rules changed here:
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Special:Mo...odid=25633
I approved the edits, and replied to the actual "proposal" fact-checking the claims and asking for a proposal.
Posts: 28,431
Threads: 2,316
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
21
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
Yesterday, 09:15 AM
Exactly the right thing to do.
I need to hit the mod queue today at some point and help clean it up. It's back up to more than 50 again.
Does anyone know what Hyoroemon is talking about on #51 that he can't post anything unless he cuts it down to just two tropes?
-- Bob
I have been Roland, Beowulf, Achilles, Gilgamesh, Clark Kent, Mary Sue, DJ Croft, Skysaber. I have been
called a hundred names and will be called a thousand more before the sun grows dim and cold....
Posts: 1,807
Threads: 7
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
3
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
Yesterday, 10:19 AM
(Yesterday, 09:15 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Exactly the right thing to do.
I need to hit the mod queue today at some point and help clean it up. It's back up to more than 50 again.
Does anyone know what Hyoroemon is talking about on #51 that he can't post anything unless he cuts it down to just two tropes?
I have no idea. Their grammar and edits have been consistently abysmal.
Posts: 27,023
Threads: 2,141
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
13
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXXII
Yesterday, 01:32 PM
(Yesterday, 09:15 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Exactly the right thing to do.
I need to hit the mod queue today at some point and help clean it up. It's back up to more than 50 again.
Does anyone know what Hyoroemon is talking about on #51 that he can't post anything unless he cuts it down to just two tropes?
I think they're following up on a post you made to their user page, back before you had to take a couple of weeks off.
|