Image dump thread XXXI

[Norgarth]

[Norgarth]

[Norgarth]

[Norgarth]

[robkelk]

Norgarth, there's something wrong with your image copies. Every so often, as in this one, thre's a mark over a word that makes the text difficult to read.

Can you do something about fixing that, please?

Why am I thinking of Pokémon? <g>

[Labster]

Yeah, all of those censored images are totally regarded.  Whoever does that needs to be made unalive.

[Norgarth]

Norgarth, there's something wrong with your image copies. Every so often, as in this one, thre's a mark over a word that makes the text difficult to read.

Can you do something about fixing that, please?

No because that's the way I find them

[robkelk]

Norgarth, there's something wrong with your image copies. Every so often, as in this one, thre's a mark over a word that makes the text difficult to read.

Can you do something about fixing that, please?

No because that's the way I find them

It might be best to follow the posts back to their sources and use the originals instead of the censored versions, then.

That would have other advantages as well. Off the top of my head:

• The actual creator would be known.
  
• The re-use licence would be known.
  
• The age of the image would be known.
  
• The source of the image would be known.
  

Knowing all of this would make it possible to actually re-use the images legally.

[Norgarth]

2/3 or so of them I find on Facebook, which seems to alternate between finding the original post or it's been shared a couple dozen times (if not more). For a lot of them, I wouldn't be surprised if the creator doesn't what the appropriate re-use licence is.

[Norgarth]

[robkelk]

With a capital "P"? What, were they selling tickets to their reunion concert?

[Labster]

With a capital "P"? What, were they selling tickets to their reunion concert?

That's the thing about his mom.  Every little thing she does is magic.

[robkelk]

Count the tropes.



Source

[Norgarth]