blackaeronaut Wrote:Yes indeed... but that pales in comparison to having a reactor that is 100-fold more powerful than the ones at Chernobyl blow its stack. That will have far more lasting consequences.
Where are you getting you information?
This reactor is half as powerful as the 1Gw Chernobyl 4 reactor. Also, it is contained within a heavy steel containment structure, which is intact, and wasn't present at Chernobyl. What actually exploded was just a lightweight outer building from the appearance of things. There isn't a chance in hell of this thing going Chernobyl.
The worst that could happen is that it TMI's.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?