Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thunderbolt vs. USB 3.0
 
#2
ok, what follows is my take on this. I may have some stuff wrong, and if I do I would appreciate being corrected.

Thunderbolt (aka lightpeak):

- Pros

* absurd transfer throughput (20Gb/sec theoretical max)

* Direct extension of the PCI-E bus, so anything that used to be on a PCI-E card can now be plugged in via a cable (yes, even a graphics card)



- cons

* cost, it requires a lot of silicon to implement. Both in the ports and in the cables (there are 12 chips in each cable *boggle*)

* Direct extension of the PCI-E bus, so someone can make a malicious thunderbolt device that could slurp the contents of memory simply by plugging it into your computer.

USB 3

- Pros

* damn cheap to implement

* fast enough for most consumer applications

- cons

* still has to use processor time if you want to transfer data (leading to performance bottlenecks)

I don't think it's going to be either-or. Apple has announced both thunderbolt and usb 3 on their most recent products. And a quick search on newegg also shows motherboards from Intel that have both ports as well.
-Terry
-----
"so listen up boy, or pornography starring your mother will be the second worst thing to happen to you today"
TF2: Spy
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Thunderbolt vs. USB 3.0 - by Black Aeronaut - 06-18-2012, 10:23 AM
[No subject] - by sweno - 06-18-2012, 06:53 PM
[No subject] - by ECSNorway - 06-18-2012, 08:03 PM
[No subject] - by LynnInDenver - 06-18-2012, 08:10 PM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 06-19-2012, 10:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)