The article does seem to be, at least partially, an adverisement for the author's forensic software. That does not, however, mean that his conclusions are wrong. There are articles, linked to in the comments, criticising the original article, but they, frankly, come across as somewhat unhinged.
And honestly, there's more than enough money involved that if there was a good case, the lawyers would have come out.
And honestly, there's more than enough money involved that if there was a good case, the lawyers would have come out.