It could be said that I have very strong feelings about pseudoanonymity. I've tried to keep myself from getting too abrasive, but... *shrug* perhaps not well enough.
Wasn't giving DQ any of those permissions already noped before this discussion even started?
Also, I did say "precedent", not "policy". If you had a policy, you could write down under what circumstances you would or would not require some higher degree of identity verification. Precedents are fuzzier, which I think could lead to more more trouble down the road.
It looks like it could be a moot point in any case, given the support allowing multiple accounts in general is getting.
Or if DQ decides to take their ball and go home, which looks entirely possible if I'm reading the log properly.
-Morgan.
Wasn't giving DQ any of those permissions already noped before this discussion even started?
Also, I did say "precedent", not "policy". If you had a policy, you could write down under what circumstances you would or would not require some higher degree of identity verification. Precedents are fuzzier, which I think could lead to more more trouble down the road.
It looks like it could be a moot point in any case, given the support allowing multiple accounts in general is getting.
Or if DQ decides to take their ball and go home, which looks entirely possible if I'm reading the log properly.
-Morgan.