wrote: Wrote:Second thing first: That is good news!
As for MM9K...
The statement "I would prefer if it would be hidden again and considered resolved, for the same reason" tells me that there's no reason to keep the sockpuppet account active. If MM9K wants the matter dropped, then we drop it and close the duplicate account.
Of course we won't hide the discussion. Does rule 6 of the Policy for Wiki Staff apply?
Given this is a matter of public record concerning a user who was banned for reason determined to be suitable and who has proven their first ban was justified by their own actions, the matter should remain public in the event of later question concerning the judgment of the admins, aka, we won't censor for prejudice as determined by rule 6, as we want to make clear the decision was reached on its objective merits, not any undue bias.
Second, having personally dealt with this user, letting them hide anything of this nature would be counterproductive, not to mention would be showing undue partiality for a matter that is in no way sensitive nor deserving special discretion.
And thanks for the opinion on my father's health, I couldn't agree more.