I've seen analysis of the merits of the cases by professional lawyers.
Phrases like "transparantly meritless" were used.
The charitable interpretion of them is that the guy's a con-artist planning on using them as a publicity stunt to grift money to support his case (which he's clearly spent about $1.37 on) from the gullible.
Phrases like "transparantly meritless" were used.
The charitable interpretion of them is that the guy's a con-artist planning on using them as a publicity stunt to grift money to support his case (which he's clearly spent about $1.37 on) from the gullible.