All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXVI

[robkelk]

...
He's back. And the tone of his latest post is remarkably similar to Usenet posts back in the day from single-issue posters or trolls.

I suggest that those of us who have identified ourselves as mods not reply directly to that post, since doing so would provide the attention that the poster wants.

Oh, and Max Sinister has fired his latest salvo.  I am firmly convinced that the only reason he joined the wiki is to cause trouble.
...

Posts that pass in the night... I've had my say on the matter by replying to Umbrie.

Well, it's become flagrantly clear they do not wish to contribute positively unless we bend to their unreasonable demands to bluenose bowdlerise ourselves to please them. Since we do not like to ban without cause, I'm going to make one post telling them this is going nowhere, our position is clear, the discussion is OVER. Anything other than compliance will be met with a block of nothing less than a year.

That way, they can't say they were not warned.

And Bob, much obliged for the technical report.

Geth, "Disagreeing with a mod" is specifically listed as something that we do not ban people for.

We have no cause to ban this user. At all.

If you make that post, you'll be leaving yourself open to complaints that the rest of us will have to act on.