Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky
#16
Quote:
The GC crew did it differently, and more slowly -- taking two years to slowly grow a 'wavium hull, using local silicates as raw materials. One of the "specials"/"cool stuff" I'm calling in for my story is the idea that the coven can influence (slightly) what the 'wavium decides to do. Per rule 1, Handwavium is like a cat, but even a cat can be herded if 20 people work together on it...
Interesting. Different approaches...
Looking at the two large-scale projects, it seems that Grover's Corners was fashioned in a far more...careful and systematic fashion. The Islanders were a lot more haphazard and irresponsible in their land-conversion...saturating the ground with a special diluted 'wavium mix. Hence, the whole 'wave-pollution bit.
I'm guessing that Grover's Corners, then, is basically a giant bowl-shaped wavium hull...with unaltered soil and earth inside it. And then the buildings on top.
Kokuten's Hephaestus is on a smaller scale, but comparable...in the sense that it's a basket of concrete and sundry materials containing regular land.
In contrast, all the land that makes up the Island, all of it, is 'waved. To some degree.
Quote:
If the Grover's Corners handwavium drive is in fact a "real" spindizzy, there is no upper limit. We could just as easily have taken the whole county as the 250 acres.
The Island's original lift drive is a similar sort of uber-'waved device. I need to go back and edit the ship registry entry...I've developed the concept a bit more since I wrote that. The numbers are wrong anyway.
But basically, the Island took off with an extremely powerful "antigravity" drive. The thing extends a field-of-effect to anything its in contact with...regardless of mass.
Well. Actually "antigravity" is a misnomer. That's what many of the Island crew call it. But what the device really seems to do is reduce effective mass. "Mass-reduction field" is more accurate.
IE, you still need rockets and such for propulsion, but what the rockets are pushing...suddenly seems a lot lighter.
-- Acyl
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by CattyNebulart - 03-10-2007, 09:52 PM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by CattyNebulart - 03-12-2007, 12:40 AM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 03-12-2007, 01:22 AM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Acyl - 03-12-2007, 05:01 PM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by CattyNebulart - 03-13-2007, 04:50 PM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 03-14-2007, 07:17 AM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 03-18-2007, 07:43 AM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 03-28-2007, 10:38 PM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 04-22-2007, 04:27 AM
Re: Disturbing Implications of Land Rising into the Sky - by Herr Bad Moon - 04-26-2007, 08:16 AM
[No subject] - by Proginoskes - 06-11-2010, 10:22 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 06-12-2010, 12:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)