Drunkard's Walk Forums › General › Fenspace v
For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry
ECSNorway Offline
Established Member
***
Posts: 4,919
Threads: 196
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 2
Re: hm
#28
09-01-2007, 04:35 AM
I sincerely doubt that the Navy would give up. It's actually been a big source of discussion now and again - the Air Force claims that "if it flies, it's ours, thus space is ours", and when it was at most a few people at a time in a smallish craft like a Shuttle, they had a point.
The Navy, on the other hand, is the only military institution with experience at managing large crewed vehicles in a hostile environment, and after all, they call them ships, don't they?
The Navy would not give up their space program that easily... or at all. [Image: smile.gif] --
"I give you the beautiful... the talented... the tirelessly atomic-powered...
R!
DOROTHY!
WAYNERIGHT!
--
Sucrose Octanitrate.
Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 01:20 AM
Re: For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 04:18 AM
Amusing bit. - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 05:46 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 06:05 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 07:35 AM
hm - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 07:36 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 07:48 AM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 07:54 AM
Re: hm - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 08:04 AM
Re: hm - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 08:09 AM
Re: hm - by Feinan - 08-31-2007, 09:07 AM
Re: hm - by Bob Schroeck - 08-31-2007, 01:50 PM
Re: hm - by Bob Schroeck - 08-31-2007, 01:53 PM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 02:57 PM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 05:33 PM
Okay. - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 06:21 PM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 11:59 PM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 09-01-2007, 12:16 AM
Re: Hm - by Feinan - 09-01-2007, 01:35 AM
Re: Hm - by Kokuten - 09-01-2007, 03:11 AM
Re: hm - by ECSNorway - 09-01-2007, 03:52 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:31 AM
Re: hm - by ECSNorway - 09-01-2007, 04:35 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:37 AM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 09-01-2007, 04:40 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:57 AM
re: hm - by Foxboy - 09-01-2007, 05:36 AM
Re: re: hm - by Kokuten - 09-01-2007, 06:37 AM
Re: re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:41 PM
TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 03:31 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 04:29 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 04:43 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 04:57 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by ECSNorway - 09-04-2007, 06:52 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 07:04 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-04-2007, 02:23 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 03:11 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-05-2007, 03:10 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Kokuten - 09-05-2007, 08:56 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-05-2007, 09:03 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Bob Schroeck - 09-05-2007, 02:18 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-05-2007, 02:40 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Bob Schroeck - 09-05-2007, 06:52 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Kokuten - 09-05-2007, 07:32 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-05-2007, 11:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)