Well, that didn't take long.

[Morganite]

---

Or were you talking about the people who got the decision stayed?

---

That's a very good question. I was kind of hoping to have people from both sides yelling at me before I answered it though. '.'
(Assuming there *are* people from both sides here, which I admit might not be a viable assumption...)
...But you know, I thought part of the *point* of judges was that they were unelected?
Judging from the way it's described on the Arizona Daily Star's website, it sounds like all the couples but the one who got the waiver have, in legal terms, not really accomplished anything, but I'm not entirely certain. Seems like a rather dubious arrangement. That'd be like if at work we refused to check out someone who was standing waiting in line when the store closed.
-Morgan.
"You're trying to influence people's emotions with a foreign object! That's wrong!"
-Shurelia