I'd have to look deeper into the issue to say, truthfully. The point that student fees are paying for it is a good one, as is the point that they are not only for Muslim use; the point that there aren't similar facilities for use of students of other religions is also a good one.
In general, I don't think I'd disapprove, for the same reason I supported the prayer rooms which were available at the university I attended - I don't feel that it violates separation of Church and State to make it possible and comfortable for people to practice their religion of choice, so long as one isn't unduly favoured or mandated over others (including mandating any religious observances as all).
That being said, since its indisputable that the foot baths are primarily for Muslim use, I could see a valid argument that Muslim students could have paid a small extra fee to finance and maintain them.
Eh, the only way to have a really informed opinion would be to study up on the legalities of the situation, however.
In general, I don't think I'd disapprove, for the same reason I supported the prayer rooms which were available at the university I attended - I don't feel that it violates separation of Church and State to make it possible and comfortable for people to practice their religion of choice, so long as one isn't unduly favoured or mandated over others (including mandating any religious observances as all).
That being said, since its indisputable that the foot baths are primarily for Muslim use, I could see a valid argument that Muslim students could have paid a small extra fee to finance and maintain them.
Eh, the only way to have a really informed opinion would be to study up on the legalities of the situation, however.