Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ding Dong the Ding Dong's dead
Would not know 'it' if 'it' danced naked.
#41
Fidhooki thus states.
Quote:
That is bs and you know it.
Actually, it is not bs; and if you had actually read the bible, you too would know it.
If taken as inerrant word of god, the Bible, old and new testament is very specific about smiting the non-believers and enemies of all types. Moses goes so far as to detail who to kill and who to take as slaves. Luke 19:27 contains a nice example of how much of this was carried forward to the New Testament (yes it is told as a parable, a common framing device of the synoptic gospels.)
Now having said that; most Christians do not follow the inerrant word of god; they cherry-pick the parts they like and ignore the parts that they do not feel apply. If you want to sell your daughter, your can reference the appropriate verses. Want to keep slaves? It is all there. While you would be hard pressed to find precise admonitions against visiting Rosie Palm and her five daughters, you can find very precise tribal admonitions concerning cattle rights (and rites for that matter.) God hates shellfish as evidenced by Leviticus, but that is because the omniscient, omnipotent creator could not see far enough ahead to figure out refrigeration (a nice example of religion being man made.)
Now, in the context of the article referenced; Jerry Falwell was a strong proponent of the idea of an inerrant bible and stated so in his book Finding Inner Peace and Strength.
Thus Spake Jerry
Quote:
The Bible is the inerrant ... word of the living God. It is absolutely infallible,without error in all matters pertaining to faith and practice, as well as in areas such as geography, science, history, etc.
So the little bomb-making atavist was indeed keeping with the ethics and morality of the Christian Religion as espoused by Jerry and his loathsome ilk. Sadly he is not alone.
Shayne
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Ding Dong the Ding Dong's dead - by Rev Dark - 05-16-2007, 03:00 PM
Re: Ding Dong the Ding Dong's dead - by Fidoohki - 05-18-2007, 06:18 AM
A moderate proposal - by Rev Dark - 05-18-2007, 02:35 PM
Re: A moderate proposal - by M Fnord - 05-18-2007, 05:57 PM
Re: A moderate proposal - by Bob Schroeck - 05-18-2007, 07:03 PM
Re: A moderate proposal - by Kokuten - 05-18-2007, 07:19 PM
Re: A moderate proposal - by Fidoohki - 05-18-2007, 07:54 PM
Re: A moderate proposal - by Fidoohki - 05-18-2007, 08:05 PM
The Yeast of your worries - by Rev Dark - 05-18-2007, 08:37 PM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Kokuten - 05-18-2007, 10:06 PM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Kokuten - 05-18-2007, 10:17 PM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Fidoohki - 05-18-2007, 11:14 PM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Morganite - 05-18-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Kokuten - 05-19-2007, 12:26 AM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Fidoohki - 05-19-2007, 01:30 AM
Re: The Yeast of your worries - by Bob Schroeck - 05-19-2007, 02:03 AM
Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Rev Dark - 05-19-2007, 08:26 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by CattyNebulart - 05-20-2007, 01:19 AM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Kokuten - 05-20-2007, 06:23 AM
Here we go again... - by Morganite - 05-20-2007, 06:50 AM
Various replies - by Rev Dark - 05-20-2007, 11:29 AM
This is getting way of topic, but... - by CattyNebulart - 05-20-2007, 01:54 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Fidoohki - 05-20-2007, 02:40 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by CattyNebulart - 05-20-2007, 03:58 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Fidoohki - 05-20-2007, 05:14 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Kokuten - 05-20-2007, 05:56 PM
Re: Various replies - by Bob Schroeck - 05-20-2007, 07:08 PM
Re: Keeping It Simple (For) Stupid - by Fidoohki - 05-20-2007, 07:24 PM
Reply - by Rev Dark - 05-22-2007, 11:47 AM
Re: Reply - by Kokuten - 05-22-2007, 04:44 PM
Re: Reply - by Bob Schroeck - 05-22-2007, 07:16 PM
Re: Reply - by DHBirr - 05-22-2007, 11:41 PM
Re: Reply - by Kokuten - 05-22-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: Reply - by Kokuten - 05-27-2007, 08:07 PM
Re: Reply - by Fidoohki - 05-27-2007, 09:31 PM
Re: Reply - by Kokuten - 05-28-2007, 09:11 AM
Re: Reply - by Fidoohki - 05-28-2007, 02:16 PM
Would not know 'it' if 'it' danced naked. - by Rev Dark - 05-28-2007, 03:15 PM
Re: Reply - by CattyNebulart - 05-28-2007, 07:01 PM
Re: Reply - by Logan Darklighter - 05-28-2007, 09:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)