Interesting. Thank you.
The part about homgenous chemistry made me think of something in the first article in the OP...
I wonder if there's any difference in the effect of solar variation on the different kinds of chemistry the epa page talks about. I'm not certain what they're referring to all the time in that first article.
(I think I'd been misreading that article all along; I thought they were saying increased solar output would cause further damage, but upon rereading it seems to be the opposite. Lucky for me, the comment I made relating to that means the same thing either way. '.' )
Sometimes the media makes it hard to understand what's going on. '.'
-Morgan."This continuity is now a Princess of Darkness crossover."
"... They're all going to die, aren't they?"
"Yep. Popcorn?"
The part about homgenous chemistry made me think of something in the first article in the OP...
Quote:Except those things would all be things to worry about primarily because of decreases of the global ozone levels, not because of the hole in particular. (Unless I'm really missing something, wouldn't you have to be *in* antarctica to get increased chances of skin cancer due to the ozone hole there?)
The hole in the ozone layer could grow significantly over the next few years, reigniting fears over skin cancer, cataracts and damage to vulnerable plant life.
I wonder if there's any difference in the effect of solar variation on the different kinds of chemistry the epa page talks about. I'm not certain what they're referring to all the time in that first article.
(I think I'd been misreading that article all along; I thought they were saying increased solar output would cause further damage, but upon rereading it seems to be the opposite. Lucky for me, the comment I made relating to that means the same thing either way. '.' )
Sometimes the media makes it hard to understand what's going on. '.'
-Morgan."This continuity is now a Princess of Darkness crossover."
"... They're all going to die, aren't they?"
"Yep. Popcorn?"