Quote:
Perhaps that is because their membership includes the vast majority of qualified scientists working in the relevent areas on this planet.
But you see, it doesn't. The IPCC is a sham, and has been for the past several years, and this is becoming more and more evident.
How can you take any 'panel' seriously when they counted *the media* in their membership numbers at the last meeting? When more than 50% of the 'signees' on the last report had no relevant scientific qualifications? When attendees who had issues and didn't agree with the conclusions presented were listed as signees anyway?
How can I *not* dismiss them when they're clearly a *political* entity, and not a *scientific* one? --
Christopher Angel, aka JPublic
The Works of Christopher Angel
"Camaraderie, adventure, and steel on steel. The stuff of legend! Right, Boo?"