I don't find it believable that increased energy input would have no effect at all.
But how much effect does it have? Is increased solar output one of the factors included in the current model?
If not, then why not?
Forget deciding what is "primarily" causing anything, are these things being taken into account at all? (Of course, determining what effect this might have on years prior to the availablity of solar output data could prove difficult.)
Oh, and this might be of interest: www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=98
(They don't seem to do an extraordinary job at being readable on that site, do they?)
-Morgan is saying nothing about their content there. Their site design makes my eyes hurt. >
But how much effect does it have? Is increased solar output one of the factors included in the current model?
If not, then why not?
Forget deciding what is "primarily" causing anything, are these things being taken into account at all? (Of course, determining what effect this might have on years prior to the availablity of solar output data could prove difficult.)
Oh, and this might be of interest: www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=98
(They don't seem to do an extraordinary job at being readable on that site, do they?)
-Morgan is saying nothing about their content there. Their site design makes my eyes hurt. >