There is an issue with your comparison ECS old son.
There are truckloads of peer reviewed research concerning global climate change.
There is not a jot of evidence for god.
Now onto that what is your point.
Science is not a popularity contest; nor is it democratic. It is based entirely on the theories presented, the evidence backing them up, etc.
Unfortunately there is still a popularity contest mentality in the perception of science - as if a particular group can change extant theories based on desire rather than evidence. Wouldn't it be nice if the Intelligent Design goobers took a shot at gravity? God and weeping baby Jesus say gravity makes the holy ghost break out in the ecto-runnies; therefore gravity is optional. I would hold baptist flying lessons on the tenth floor every Friday. Here endeth the lesson. SPLAT!
Contrary to the voices that somehow manage to leak through the tin-foil, politicians in the 20th Century do not compare anyone who dares question global warming to Holocaust-Denying Nazi fucktards, or for that matter, sheep Schtupping Speedo Spelunkers or even Malignant, maniacal, Marie-Osmond Molesters. That is a strawman at best, hyperbole at worst.
(Oh and for those who looked at the list of 100 scientists who question global warming that was waved like particularly fetid turd at the recent Al Gore congressional hearing; I would ask that you look into the Steve project.)
Bottom line - the real debate of global climate change is being carried out in peer reviewed journals, not in the media - that is the popularity contest.
Shayne
There are truckloads of peer reviewed research concerning global climate change.
There is not a jot of evidence for god.
Now onto that what is your point.
Science is not a popularity contest; nor is it democratic. It is based entirely on the theories presented, the evidence backing them up, etc.
Unfortunately there is still a popularity contest mentality in the perception of science - as if a particular group can change extant theories based on desire rather than evidence. Wouldn't it be nice if the Intelligent Design goobers took a shot at gravity? God and weeping baby Jesus say gravity makes the holy ghost break out in the ecto-runnies; therefore gravity is optional. I would hold baptist flying lessons on the tenth floor every Friday. Here endeth the lesson. SPLAT!
Contrary to the voices that somehow manage to leak through the tin-foil, politicians in the 20th Century do not compare anyone who dares question global warming to Holocaust-Denying Nazi fucktards, or for that matter, sheep Schtupping Speedo Spelunkers or even Malignant, maniacal, Marie-Osmond Molesters. That is a strawman at best, hyperbole at worst.
(Oh and for those who looked at the list of 100 scientists who question global warming that was waved like particularly fetid turd at the recent Al Gore congressional hearing; I would ask that you look into the Steve project.)
Bottom line - the real debate of global climate change is being carried out in peer reviewed journals, not in the media - that is the popularity contest.
Shayne