Actually Ayiekie I said "Radical" muslim.
By the logic of my statement you should have said Radical christians or "a minority of extremist christians", not class all christians as thinking rapist should have visitation rights or with the tiny minority who think murdering or bombing the "trained professional murders" most non-christians call abortion doctors.
Why are you defending the Radical muslim by attacking all christians?
I don't defend the extremist christians that bomb abortion clinics or attack the abortion doctors.
Your creating a straw man ignoring key words in my statement and seem to be letting an anger at christians and thier beliefs cloud your statements and lead you to defending the radically extreme members of the muslim religion.
A group that have no defense for their actions.
I would never think to defend the actions of a murderer of an abortion doctor.
I wasn't talking about all muslims just the radical ones like the man in Seattle who thought it was right to attack non-combatants or helpless people.
For Epsilon
The man's state of mind wasn't that important 20 years ago he probably would have done it in the name of the neo-nazis or kkk.
You did bring up a thought what does this say about the sanity of the large minority of radicals in Lebonon who are willing to set up missiles near schools and private homes or even neutral third parties in the hope the ones they are attacking will be forced to shoot through women and children to stop the murder of their own people.
I also thought I had contrasted my "headline" well enough to point out how politically correct the newspaper's headline was.
Such politically correct headlines serve to conceal the true nature of the murderous event biasing any search made of headlines for muslim terrorism in the US.
Would you think it right to conceal the true nature of the event if the man in seattle had instead picked up reading material and videos from the neo-nazis or kkk and used that to feed his insanity?
I think radical muslims should be viewed the same as the neo-nazis and watched just as carefully it is currently politically correct to ignore them because the are loosely associated with a major religion.
The kkk are loosely associated with the christian religion should we give them the same pass as we are giving the radical muslims?
howard melton
By the logic of my statement you should have said Radical christians or "a minority of extremist christians", not class all christians as thinking rapist should have visitation rights or with the tiny minority who think murdering or bombing the "trained professional murders" most non-christians call abortion doctors.
Why are you defending the Radical muslim by attacking all christians?
I don't defend the extremist christians that bomb abortion clinics or attack the abortion doctors.
Your creating a straw man ignoring key words in my statement and seem to be letting an anger at christians and thier beliefs cloud your statements and lead you to defending the radically extreme members of the muslim religion.
A group that have no defense for their actions.
I would never think to defend the actions of a murderer of an abortion doctor.
I wasn't talking about all muslims just the radical ones like the man in Seattle who thought it was right to attack non-combatants or helpless people.
For Epsilon
The man's state of mind wasn't that important 20 years ago he probably would have done it in the name of the neo-nazis or kkk.
You did bring up a thought what does this say about the sanity of the large minority of radicals in Lebonon who are willing to set up missiles near schools and private homes or even neutral third parties in the hope the ones they are attacking will be forced to shoot through women and children to stop the murder of their own people.
I also thought I had contrasted my "headline" well enough to point out how politically correct the newspaper's headline was.
Such politically correct headlines serve to conceal the true nature of the murderous event biasing any search made of headlines for muslim terrorism in the US.
Would you think it right to conceal the true nature of the event if the man in seattle had instead picked up reading material and videos from the neo-nazis or kkk and used that to feed his insanity?
I think radical muslims should be viewed the same as the neo-nazis and watched just as carefully it is currently politically correct to ignore them because the are loosely associated with a major religion.
The kkk are loosely associated with the christian religion should we give them the same pass as we are giving the radical muslims?
howard melton