I'm shocked, absolutely shocked, that you haven't yet responded yet to apologise to the people in the Iranian government you slandered, ECSNorway, not to mention, of course, that you insulted everybody here who has pointed out that maybe Iran's government is not led by the Legion Of SuperHitlers.
Maybe you're away for the weekend? That's probably it. No worries. I'll graciously await your return.
Incidentally, while frantically backpeddling from their blatently untrue story, the National Post has tried to distance itself from the source they wrote from (ignoring the fact they wrote the story as a legitimate news story, not an op-ed), one Amir Teheri.
www.benadorassociates.com/taheri.php
Why, bless my stars. Amir Teheri is an associate of a right-wing PR firm that one can hire conservative speakers from (I wonder if they can get the Ultimate Warrior on tap?). He's also the author of an enormous amount of articles, including a whole plethora of articles pushing for war with Iran and one claiming Muslims attacked London because they're trying to control what you eat for breakfast. He's also called antiwar protestors allies of Saddam Hussein. Lovely, obviously trustworthy fellow with no bias here at all.
He also, it seems, repeated his already debunked and laughable story to the New York Post AFTER it had been debunked and the original paper that broke the story was racing to disown it. Of course, they printed it. Vive les mdias Amricains!
Oh, the glorious parallels to Nazi Germany. For, of course, what better propaganda can there be than painting your foes as Nazis? People on the Internet figured that one out long ago, so it's nice to see the mainstream media catching on.
I wonder, did you believe them when they told you how the Iraqi soldiers took babies out of incubators?
Is there a lie so blatent, so outrageous, so devoid of any speck of reality that it will not be believed, if it happens to coincide with what you wanted to believe in the first place?
Perhaps that's a question you should be asking yourself when they tell you that Ahmadinejad bites the head off of Christian babies, or whatever the next obvious piece of manufactured propaganda is.
Meanwhile, in the realm of reality, there actually is a clothing-related story going down in Iraq:
www.worldpress.org/print_...4&dont=yes
There's actually lots of conclusions to be drawn from this story (other than, hilariously, The Completely Insane and Intolerant SuperHitler President Ahmadinejad actually trying to loosen restrictions on women on Iran). As a thought experiment, try coming up with some.
Or just wait until the next time they tell you Iran is going to nuke Wisconsin and war is the only answer. Maybe it'll be the New York Post telling you. I mean, sure, THIS time they printed a story that had already been proven false, but NEXT time they'll be right for sure! You don't have to actually look beyond the sources that tell you what you want to know: it's the PAPER! Just like the government, they'd never lie to you!
That's sure thinking with your brain, not with your asshole, right?
Maybe you're away for the weekend? That's probably it. No worries. I'll graciously await your return.
Incidentally, while frantically backpeddling from their blatently untrue story, the National Post has tried to distance itself from the source they wrote from (ignoring the fact they wrote the story as a legitimate news story, not an op-ed), one Amir Teheri.
www.benadorassociates.com/taheri.php
Why, bless my stars. Amir Teheri is an associate of a right-wing PR firm that one can hire conservative speakers from (I wonder if they can get the Ultimate Warrior on tap?). He's also the author of an enormous amount of articles, including a whole plethora of articles pushing for war with Iran and one claiming Muslims attacked London because they're trying to control what you eat for breakfast. He's also called antiwar protestors allies of Saddam Hussein. Lovely, obviously trustworthy fellow with no bias here at all.
He also, it seems, repeated his already debunked and laughable story to the New York Post AFTER it had been debunked and the original paper that broke the story was racing to disown it. Of course, they printed it. Vive les mdias Amricains!
Oh, the glorious parallels to Nazi Germany. For, of course, what better propaganda can there be than painting your foes as Nazis? People on the Internet figured that one out long ago, so it's nice to see the mainstream media catching on.
I wonder, did you believe them when they told you how the Iraqi soldiers took babies out of incubators?
Is there a lie so blatent, so outrageous, so devoid of any speck of reality that it will not be believed, if it happens to coincide with what you wanted to believe in the first place?
Perhaps that's a question you should be asking yourself when they tell you that Ahmadinejad bites the head off of Christian babies, or whatever the next obvious piece of manufactured propaganda is.
Meanwhile, in the realm of reality, there actually is a clothing-related story going down in Iraq:
www.worldpress.org/print_...4&dont=yes
There's actually lots of conclusions to be drawn from this story (other than, hilariously, The Completely Insane and Intolerant SuperHitler President Ahmadinejad actually trying to loosen restrictions on women on Iran). As a thought experiment, try coming up with some.
Or just wait until the next time they tell you Iran is going to nuke Wisconsin and war is the only answer. Maybe it'll be the New York Post telling you. I mean, sure, THIS time they printed a story that had already been proven false, but NEXT time they'll be right for sure! You don't have to actually look beyond the sources that tell you what you want to know: it's the PAPER! Just like the government, they'd never lie to you!
That's sure thinking with your brain, not with your asshole, right?