Epsilon wrote:
Just a question for those of you who support no gun control legislation:
At what point do "arms" stop being protected by the constitution?
Rifles?
Handguns?
Automatic weapons?
Gernades?
Rocket Propelled Gernades?
Mortars?
Artillery?
Patriot Missles?
ICBMs?
I mean, obviously there must be SOME point where people aren't allowed to have weapons. I'm just curious where everyone draws the lines.
-----------------
Epsilon
Myself I define it by:
a.) use in immediate defense of self and others
b.) use for hunting.
c.) direct control of target area.
If you can honestly answer yes to all three of these then it should be legal..within reason.
Just my take on it.