A bit of A and B, but no C.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz
If Bretibart is remaining impartial, then their spokesman resigning over the incident is not what I would call a model of impartiality:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016 ... /81688750/
The relevant part to me is this:
"Bardella said Breitbart has been looking for a reason to disprove the incident, when all the evidence strongly suggests Fields' version is accurate,
"I just disagree with the course of which they’ve been covering this, and how they’ve treated Michelle," he told CNN."
And of course you have also this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... ge%2Fstory
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz
If Bretibart is remaining impartial, then their spokesman resigning over the incident is not what I would call a model of impartiality:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016 ... /81688750/
The relevant part to me is this:
"Bardella said Breitbart has been looking for a reason to disprove the incident, when all the evidence strongly suggests Fields' version is accurate,
"I just disagree with the course of which they’ve been covering this, and how they’ve treated Michelle," he told CNN."
And of course you have also this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... ge%2Fstory
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell