Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The fight to nominate Scalia's replacement
 
#2
Questions

1: is there any legal Precedent to have the situation wait for practically a year to be resolved? I know of none and unless there is some legal reason for doing so i don't think they legally can put it off that long. Now they can hold the appointment up in committee and on the floor for the year, but that may cost them the election.

2: what reason do you have to think that its going to be Rubio or Bush and not Cruz or Trump. I mean yeah, they have the "establishment" vote, maybe, but the damn country is pissed at the establishment and this is leading to higher numbers showing up for Cruz and Trump.
 
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by Rajvik - 02-15-2016, 12:06 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 02-15-2016, 12:18 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 02-15-2016, 01:25 AM
[No subject] - by khagler - 02-15-2016, 03:51 AM
[No subject] - by ordnance11 - 02-15-2016, 04:33 AM
[No subject] - by ordnance11 - 02-15-2016, 04:40 AM
[No subject] - by Rajvik - 02-15-2016, 06:03 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 02-15-2016, 09:05 AM
[No subject] - by ordnance11 - 02-15-2016, 09:46 PM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 02-17-2016, 10:50 AM
[No subject] - by Jinx999 - 02-17-2016, 08:45 PM
[No subject] - by khagler - 02-17-2016, 10:08 PM
[No subject] - by Rajvik - 02-18-2016, 06:59 AM
[No subject] - by ordnance11 - 02-18-2016, 10:05 AM
[No subject] - by Foxboy - 02-20-2016, 08:36 AM
[No subject] - by ordnance11 - 02-20-2016, 11:14 AM
[No subject] - by DHBirr - 03-07-2016, 02:44 AM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 03-07-2016, 04:56 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 03-07-2016, 01:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)