Dartz Wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ma ... ar-reactor
It appears nuclear boy might've made a little mess.
Yeah so it appears that the statements might just be a little misleading, yes plutonium was found outside the reactor, but in such low concentrations that it might date back to some old nuclear tests in the pacific.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31 ... _of_facts/
As far as I can tell the highest dose anyone has suffered is 0.17 Sv (which did cause radiation burns, ie: sunburn, except not caused by the sun), and they where rushed to several different hospitals. It takes about 1 Sv to cause radiation poisoning (though this heavily depends on the amount of time over which the dose is absorbed) and 2 Sv to make a possible lethal dose. 0.5 Sv in a year is still considered safe for long term cancer risks.
How many people have died for coal, and what has been the environmental effect of burning refineries? Nuclear power is looking like the safest option.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-
E: "Did they... did they just endorse the combination of the JSDF and US Army by showing them as two lesbian lolicons moving in together and holding hands and talking about how 'intimate' they were?"
B: "Have you forgotten so soon? They're phasing out Don't Ask, Don't Tell."