Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Faithless" Supreme Court
RE: "Faithless" Supreme Court
#2
Woah. They went all the way back to Aaron Burr - who fought in the American Revolution - for their earliest supporting case law.

So much for the Nicknamer-in-Chief's complaints that he's being treated differently than other officeholders in the executive branch. Granted, Burr only made it to Vice-President, but the precedent is still there. His Orangeness is being treated the same way that your "Founding Fathers" were treated.

The law applies to serving politicians. Good to know.
--
Rob Kelk

Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Faithless" Supreme Court - by DHBirr - 07-09-2020, 11:59 AM
RE: "Faithless" Supreme Court - by robkelk - 07-09-2020, 06:47 PM
RE: "Faithless" Supreme Court - by Star Ranger4 - 07-09-2020, 07:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)