Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Political what-if: A second Constitutional Convention
RE: Political what-if: A second Constitutional Convention
#12
(02-21-2021, 04:42 PM)hazard Wrote:
(02-21-2021, 04:19 PM)robkelk Wrote: Using the address of the jail incentivizes putting all inmates in a single district, no matter what electoral system one uses, in that all of their votes would apply only to a single district's elections.

As for tracking where ballots need to go, that's a solved problem with the current mail-in ballot system.

That using the jail's address incentivizes putting all inmates into a single district is irrelevant so long as there is only 1 district.

So, do you want every member of Congress to be elected at-large, the way the President and Vice-President would be? If not, then I don't understand what you're saying here.


(02-21-2021, 04:42 PM)hazard Wrote: And I wouldn't trust a mail in ballot system that's supposed to track where the ballot's supposed to go, both ways, when it comes to inmates in any jail, penitentiary institution or other place of confinement.

Why shouldn't inmates receive mail?
--
Rob Kelk

Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Political what-if: A second Constitutional Convention - by robkelk - 02-21-2021, 07:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)