At that point Dartz the law can still run afoul of the First Amendment. Because if you can't force the government to notice your efforts, even if at a remove, are you capable of petitioning the government for a redress of grievances, as provided as a fundamental component to the right of free speech in the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States?
Rather thin grounds for a challenge I think, but still.
Rather thin grounds for a challenge I think, but still.