Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry
Re: hm
#26
Depending on the gravity arrangements - and if you're using rotation only, that bay's gonna be close to nil-g - you could put one in 'upside down' relative to the other. They'd fit much better that way.
As for the TSAB... their /primary/ remit is scientific research, especially towards duplicating some of the more advanced space-travel tech (speed drives, etc) with hard-tech. However, it IS a military operation... which means that there is onboard security at the very least, and in the wake of the incidents leading up to SOS-con this is likely to have been beefed up. What should this include?
I'm noodling on something based around a specific set of 'wave-tech... possibly gravitic manipulation... since I'm a huge fan of the Honor Harrington stories, possibly a gravitic Sidewall generator... --
"I give you the beautiful... the talented... the tirelessly atomic-powered...
R!
DOROTHY!
WAYNERIGHT!

--
Sucrose Octanitrate.
Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 01:20 AM
Re: For kibitzing - TSAB gazetteer entry - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 04:18 AM
Amusing bit. - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 05:46 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 06:05 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 07:35 AM
hm - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 07:36 AM
Re: Amusing bit. - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 07:48 AM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 07:54 AM
Re: hm - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 08:04 AM
Re: hm - by Kokuten - 08-31-2007, 08:09 AM
Re: hm - by Feinan - 08-31-2007, 09:07 AM
Re: hm - by Bob Schroeck - 08-31-2007, 01:50 PM
Re: hm - by Bob Schroeck - 08-31-2007, 01:53 PM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 02:57 PM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 08-31-2007, 05:33 PM
Okay. - by Foxboy - 08-31-2007, 06:21 PM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 08-31-2007, 11:59 PM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 09-01-2007, 12:16 AM
Re: Hm - by Feinan - 09-01-2007, 01:35 AM
Re: Hm - by Kokuten - 09-01-2007, 03:11 AM
Re: hm - by ECSNorway - 09-01-2007, 03:52 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:31 AM
Re: hm - by ECSNorway - 09-01-2007, 04:35 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:37 AM
Re: hm - by M Fnord - 09-01-2007, 04:40 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:57 AM
re: hm - by Foxboy - 09-01-2007, 05:36 AM
Re: re: hm - by Kokuten - 09-01-2007, 06:37 AM
Re: re: hm - by robkelk - 09-01-2007, 04:41 PM
TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 03:31 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 04:29 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 04:43 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 04:57 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by ECSNorway - 09-04-2007, 06:52 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-04-2007, 07:04 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-04-2007, 02:23 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-04-2007, 03:11 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by M Fnord - 09-05-2007, 03:10 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Kokuten - 09-05-2007, 08:56 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-05-2007, 09:03 AM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Bob Schroeck - 09-05-2007, 02:18 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by robkelk - 09-05-2007, 02:40 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Bob Schroeck - 09-05-2007, 06:52 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Kokuten - 09-05-2007, 07:32 PM
Re: TSAB entry, take three - by Cobalt Greywalker - 09-05-2007, 11:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)