Skillsofts should no real replacement for genuine learning and practice at an art. I like the idea that they're a quick fix.... a chunk of code that just happens to be cheaper th/quickeran shoving a menial employee through a couple of months of training, when you can just skill-job them. And then remove the software later when they retire.
A nice downside to a skillsoft is that, while it enables you to use the skill, you can never advance in it beyond a certain level since you haven't built up the base understanding of the concepts behind the skill.... you just know how to follow what the program tells your body to do. You might get more comfortable using the skillsoft, but you're not using the skill itself. Transplanting that base understand requires the trading of a lot more than a simple 'how to do', and a lot more invasive manipulation of the brain.
Might that work?
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
A nice downside to a skillsoft is that, while it enables you to use the skill, you can never advance in it beyond a certain level since you haven't built up the base understanding of the concepts behind the skill.... you just know how to follow what the program tells your body to do. You might get more comfortable using the skillsoft, but you're not using the skill itself. Transplanting that base understand requires the trading of a lot more than a simple 'how to do', and a lot more invasive manipulation of the brain.
Might that work?
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?