Just for fun: If we didn't have our self-imposed limits

[robkelk]

We've all agreed to the setting rules. We've also agreed that no one character can do everything allowed by the setting rules - or, for that matter, everything that would be convenient for that character. The meta reason is that being able to do everything is boring from a story perspective (ref. "http://allthetropes.org/wiki/So_You_Wa ... a_Mary_Sue]So You Want To/Avoid Writing a Mary Sue").

But what if each character could do everything in his, her, or its field that's allowed by the setting rules?

This could lead to some serious power escalation - and some serious character clashes. But it could also lead to some fun...

Exhibit A: Noah Scott can build any android, not just meganekko based on fictional characters. "Hello, I'm the vice-president of Stellvia Corporation, these are my bodyguards, and I'm here to discuss that merger you seem to not want."



Any more?
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012