So, exactly what's wrong with any of this?

[robkelk]

There's a thread over on the SJGames Forums titled "2000 MORE Things I Am No Longer Allowed To Do In An RPG"

http://forums.sjgames.com/showpost.php? ... tcount=340]This is one of the posts in it.

So, exactly what's wrong with any of those things?

910: I cannot have a hero who has enough health to survive being hit by a tank.

Isn't that part of the fun in that kind of game?

916: "For what we do here today...Generations will place us on pedistals, they wil love us and cherish us as the heroes we wish we could be...They will remember...no...They will do more than remember, they will never forget!", "When we die, In Flanders Fields we shall lie with the heroes of another war...", "Let us sell our tomorrows to buy the world a future" or any War poems are not appropriate Battle Cries.

They sound like perfectly good battle cries to me...

921: Demonically posessed Ex-WW1 Soldiers are never a Valid Concept in a High Fantasy Alternate history WW2 campaign and the GM will never let me play one again.

Why not? It wasn't your fault the other players didn't come up with as-interesting character concepts.

923: Even if we're losing the battle, using a meta-magic artifact to produce a mass area effect version of the true ressurection spell in the middle of flanders fields to ruesserect every person within 30 miles to return and battle one last time is not something the GM wants us to do.

Hey, it's the GM's own fault for letting you have the meta-magic artifact. He didn't have to put it into his own game.
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012