Treason Season??

[Mamorien]

So, how do you define socialism?

As best I've been able to tell, he "defines" it the same way he defines "liberal-progressive-globalist" over on the Irish oddsmaker thread, a way explained by one "vituperative, foul-mouthed blogger" back in 2009 when Andrew Sullivan was insisting that his objections to the Republican Party, as it had come to present itself during the Cheney adsinistration, emphatically did not "make [him] a 'radical leftist' as Michelle Malkin would say":

Yes, Mr. Sullivan, your objections emphatically do make you a "radical leftist", because in the hands of the shitkicker demagogues of the Right like Malkin, phrases like "radical leftist" have long since lost any meaning. They are just the pejorative-du-jour, pulled from a random grab-bag of Limbaugh-words -- socialist, elitist, feminist, Marxist, anti-American, compassionate, cut-and-run, surrender, Liberal, extremist, collectivist, queer, Communist, fascist, atheist, humanist, "New York", "San Francisco", “Chicago”, French, European -- that each used to have discrete and very different meanings, but are now bleated interchangeably by the Pig People and their overlords at anyone with a softer heart than Curtis LeMay and less imperial ambitions than Genghis Khan.

(I'm being specious and unfair, I know. Rajvik may never have listened to Limbaugh. He may instead get all his information from Fox "News", the network that has been scientifically proven to leave its viewers less informed about the world than people who watch literally no news at all. Or both. It wouldn't surprise me either way.)

Also, last time I checked, the Nordic Model seems to work pretty damn well.

Check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model

I challenge you to tell me just how that system is broken.

I predict that his "answer" will be like a train wreck made of clown cars.