(06-28-2019, 08:16 PM)Rajvik Wrote: What they are probably not saying, (I will be honest, I only saw the headline which was all it took to know the case) is that the woman started and provoked the fight that got her shot.
She WAS NOT A VICTIM
The way I see that it doesn't really matter in this particular case. They are charging her with a crime based on a law which was not in effect at the time that the event occurred; to make matter worse, the police already charged her under existing laws at that time (at least according to the article) and the grand jury did not indict her at that time.