Democracy is not a game

[robkelk]

Starting a thread because this is a "meta" topic, not limited to any one country or any one election.


Things fall apart in the United States — and Canada takes a hard look in the mirror

Now, at the conclusion of another presidential election campaign, the ability of the United States to fulfil even the basic requirements of democracy — free and fair elections and a peaceful transfer of power — is in doubt.

As Mettler and Lieberman write, differences across political parties can be good and healthy. There's a downside to fetishizing centrism or bi-partisanship. But the system can start to break down when politicians and citizens view each other as enemies rather than rivals.

American politics is Canada's second-favourite spectator sport. And we have long defined and measured ourselves by how unlike the United States we are. Though the term fell out of use during the Obama era, it used to be that accusing someone of participating in "American-style politics" was a grievous charge in Canada.

That oppositional tendency might serve Canada well now. But this is hardly the time for anyone to feel smug. The United States is reminding us now that nothing is guaranteed, nothing can be taken for granted.

Democracy can be silly and entertaining and a wonder to behold. But it is not a game.

[DHBirr]

"Americans are benevolently ignorant about Canada, while Canadians are malevolently well-informed about the United States." — J. Bartlet Brebner, 1895-1957, Canadian historian and professor

-----
Considering that one dictionary definition of "carry on" is to "behave or speak in a foolish, excited, or improper manner," the designers of that famous poster, "Keep Calm and Carry On," need to make up their flippin' minds!

[SilverFang01]

I would be lying if I said that I wasn’t concerned about the upcoming election.

Will everything work as intended and have a peaceful transition of power, or will Republicans decide to launch a coup and be done with it at last?

[robkelk]

Can Canada avoid the economic damage that comes with a U.S.-style political split?

tl;dr: Maybe, if we're vigilant in protecting our democracy. And we have a (slight) advantage in our political boundaries being drawn by bureaucrats instead of politicians, which leads to somewhat less gerrymandering and thus to slightly more compromise candidates than elsewhere.