Hence the codicil that established organizations can recognize AI on their own...
"Man is the animal that laughs", I say, proposing a 'humor test'..
But again, you are correct, the definition of Emotion is a sticky wicket, and can consume many pints of beer and person-hours of brain capacity.
"Man is the animal that laughs", I say, proposing a 'humor test'..
But again, you are correct, the definition of Emotion is a sticky wicket, and can consume many pints of beer and person-hours of brain capacity.
Quote:Besides, this is Fenspace.. can you see us wrapping ourselves up in legal wrangling, when it's easier, better, more moral, and more ethical to setup a permissive framework with some controls against rogues, and just... go for it?Wire Geek - Burning the weak and trampling the dead since 1979Wire Geek - Burning the weak and trampling the dead since 1979
The definition of 'emotionally active' commonly attached to that statement runs several hundred K of suggested testing methods, lists of AI and constructs that pass, and why, and a shorter list of same that have failed.