Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction
#5
The problem, when matching relative velocities is eliminated, then becomes: What are the Reavers using to penetrate ship's hulls?
I mean, if an ounce-and-a-half of stel-jacketed slug from a .50 Browning machine gun is ineffective against a 'waved hull, then obviously they're not using a crowbar to pry open the airlock doors.
We need to define more clearly what the limits of a 'waved hull's integrity actually are.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by The Hunterminator - 01-17-2007, 06:35 PM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Sirrocco - 01-18-2007, 04:03 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Duane Peters - 01-18-2007, 04:14 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Kokuten - 01-18-2007, 04:36 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Sirrocco - 01-18-2007, 07:48 AM
Re: Why you don't need explicit waved weapons - by KJ - 01-19-2007, 03:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)