Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction
#11
Quote:
Ramming is effective for anti-ship attacks if you're small enough to catch your target and can hit them hard enough but Reavers don't profit by it so they aren't likely to use it except in extremes. The 'ramming to board' design seems like it would work
And you just know that if they actually have a major capship, it's going to be a Adeptus Astartes Cathedral, complete with those nifty boarding barges it fires in bloody broadsides.
-Griever
When tact is required, use brute force. When force is required, use greater force.
When the greatest force is required, use your head. Surprise is everything. - The Book of Cataclysm
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by The Hunterminator - 01-17-2007, 06:35 PM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Sirrocco - 01-18-2007, 04:03 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Kokuten - 01-18-2007, 04:36 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Sirrocco - 01-18-2007, 07:48 AM
Re: [META] Perceived Setting Assumption Contradiction - by Rieverre - 01-18-2007, 04:42 PM
Re: Why you don't need explicit waved weapons - by KJ - 01-19-2007, 03:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)