Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Relative Times for Posts
 
#8
The way they've implemented it, the relative time display takes more resources than the absolute time display. (I can see the absolute times for a half-second when the page loads, then they're over-written.) And the relative time display isn't particularly precise. So there's two reasons to go back to the old system... which I like better, BTW.
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Relative Times for Posts - by Ankhani - 12-04-2012, 02:42 AM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 12-04-2012, 03:04 AM
[No subject] - by Dartz - 12-04-2012, 03:16 AM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 12-04-2012, 03:18 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 12-04-2012, 06:02 AM
[No subject] - by LynnInDenver - 12-04-2012, 06:07 AM
[No subject] - by Morganite - 12-07-2012, 03:31 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 12-07-2012, 04:37 PM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 12-08-2012, 12:36 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 12-08-2012, 03:05 AM
[No subject] - by Cobalt Greywalker - 12-08-2012, 06:54 PM
[No subject] - by LynnInDenver - 12-08-2012, 08:04 PM
[No subject] - by Jorlem - 12-12-2012, 06:36 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 12-12-2012, 04:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)