Ah, you mean experts like Michael Mann (Mann et al. 1998 & the 2001 UN report), who's work used models so biased (ref McIntyre et al. 2003, 2005) as to create a warming trend even when fed random input?
I'm not at true believer, I'm just holding out for more information. A new study by Richard T. Barber shows that the ocean's ability to pull carbon from the atmosphere is probably understated. It is also my understanding that many of the atmospheric models used stop below the upper atmosphere because we're not sure what happens up there, that NASA article I linked to illustrates this.
The first IPCC First Assessment Report gave the equation Delta F = 6.3*ln(C/Co) so DeltaF=6.3*ln(377/280)=1.874Watts/m2. That should be measurable in the rate of cooling during the evening, yes? Compare the cooling rates from recording stations that have been in place since at least early last century with what their current rates are now. That would be quite a telling argument. I remember seeing someone's for Antarctica and we are cooling much faster today than we were fifty years ago.
I'm not at true believer, I'm just holding out for more information. A new study by Richard T. Barber shows that the ocean's ability to pull carbon from the atmosphere is probably understated. It is also my understanding that many of the atmospheric models used stop below the upper atmosphere because we're not sure what happens up there, that NASA article I linked to illustrates this.
The first IPCC First Assessment Report gave the equation Delta F = 6.3*ln(C/Co) so DeltaF=6.3*ln(377/280)=1.874Watts/m2. That should be measurable in the rate of cooling during the evening, yes? Compare the cooling rates from recording stations that have been in place since at least early last century with what their current rates are now. That would be quite a telling argument. I remember seeing someone's for Antarctica and we are cooling much faster today than we were fifty years ago.