I'm sorry, ECSNorway, the what? Oh, a search indicates that's a derogatory nickname for the Guardian; the same search indicates that Guardian was awarded National Newspaper of the Year in 1999 and 2006 by the British Press Awards. I do believe I once posted 11 articles, one of which was from that? Is that what you're trying to make a point about?
Sure, then, for the sake of argument, say I did, that the Guardian is unreliable, and that I wasn't posting something that could be found in other papers as well. Bully for you, ECS.
Now, does that somehow make the Daily Mail less of a right-wing shill paper? I mean, I suppose it's less of a right-wing shill group than this, yes, but that's hardly saying much.
I'm simply pointing out the fact that's a notoriously biased source. It has also been known before to completely distort stories to make a point, such as one infamous example when they accused former BBC Director-General John Birt of becoming a shareholder in a company that serves pornographic - and if I recall correctly, paedophiliac - interests (the company in question being Paypal).
Whether you care to find unbiased sources on stories, or whether you prefer to unquestioningly believe what stories you'd like to believe, regardless of the quality of their source, is entirely up to you, I suppose.
Sure, then, for the sake of argument, say I did, that the Guardian is unreliable, and that I wasn't posting something that could be found in other papers as well. Bully for you, ECS.
Now, does that somehow make the Daily Mail less of a right-wing shill paper? I mean, I suppose it's less of a right-wing shill group than this, yes, but that's hardly saying much.
I'm simply pointing out the fact that's a notoriously biased source. It has also been known before to completely distort stories to make a point, such as one infamous example when they accused former BBC Director-General John Birt of becoming a shareholder in a company that serves pornographic - and if I recall correctly, paedophiliac - interests (the company in question being Paypal).
Whether you care to find unbiased sources on stories, or whether you prefer to unquestioningly believe what stories you'd like to believe, regardless of the quality of their source, is entirely up to you, I suppose.