Quote:Ehh?
Thank you so much for verifying my disgust with the so-called 'liberal' movement.
Thanks. Loves and kisses to you too.
Quote:Meh. Point out a specific link you'd like me to look at. It's finals week and I don't have that much time to go look around.
Oh good. It carried a disclaimer. Im so relieved. Guess they have that disclaimer on all their documentation. Backtrack a step and look at the other articles, the U.N. is scum. They havent accomplished anything productive in years.
On the contrary, I'd find it very disturbing to live in a world without the UN, where countries unilaterally decide to invade other countries. As I've said before, the UN provides a forum to air grievances and has done much good for the world, whether through initiatives such as food distribution or demining (of landmines).
The fact that the UN has messed up in places is not IMO a good reason to scrap the body. I don't think there's any major government organization that hasn't messed up.
Also, your focus on the disclaimer seems to have completely missed my analysis. Like I said, the process seems similar to Reagan's block grants. In this case, Mexico messed up but that doesn't mean that all of the countries who received UN funding messed up.