Posts: 1,427
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation:
1
Yeah, sure, some of those news stories will dry up because the sources don't want their names publicly attached, and the resulting consequences that would be dished out to them. Not because they're "fake". And yet, some people will believe him that anonymous sources aren't real sources. (Note: I'm sure the reporters know full well who their sources are.)
It still hasn't even been a full month. I don't even have a clue as to how bad things are going to be in another 23 months at this point, much less 47, outside of the obvious that there will be no social safety net left.
--
"You know how parents tell you everything's going to fine, but you know they're lying to make you feel better? Everything's going to be fine." - The Doctor
Posts: 4,791
Threads: 299
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
8
And now we're up to..... You can't publish a story if you can't name a source shenanigans...
Ah yes. How would that have worked out for, well, just about any major scandal of the last, well, forever?
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Posts: 4,791
Threads: 299
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
8
Well, he fancies himself a gold-plated member of the second....
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Posts: 2,564
Threads: 324
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
He's declare war on the purveyor of information and a government branch that weaponizes information for a living.
Oh well. glad I didn't vote for him.
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell
