Well, we've already demonstrated that GPS coordinates are (a) susceptible to human error (ie, I looked them up/transcribed them wrong), (b) susceptible to
human error (MD punched them in wrong), or (c) slightly inaccurate (how many decimals should we have gone out to, again?)
Or you could go with the physics approach, such that there's a Circular Error of Probability going on, which of course means that the 'longer' the
range, the greater your displacement away from true center on your target...
I dunno, I don't see the need for artificial limits on them. Seems to me the recharge is a pretty decent one as-is.
--sofaspud
--"Listening to your kid is the audio equivalent of a Salvador Dali painting, Spud." --OpMegs
human error (MD punched them in wrong), or (c) slightly inaccurate (how many decimals should we have gone out to, again?)
Or you could go with the physics approach, such that there's a Circular Error of Probability going on, which of course means that the 'longer' the
range, the greater your displacement away from true center on your target...
I dunno, I don't see the need for artificial limits on them. Seems to me the recharge is a pretty decent one as-is.
--sofaspud
--"Listening to your kid is the audio equivalent of a Salvador Dali painting, Spud." --OpMegs