Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
starship ratings
Re: Star Fleet Battles
#11
Quote:
Please tell me this includes an SR-71 with glowy red ramscoops and an impulse exhuast added at the rear of the fusilage. Lie if you have to.
Mmmm, ya. The drive installations for that airframe are still being worked on and tested to see which layout functions with the greatest effciency.
The layouts so far being: Warp Drive coils & ramscoop in the engine pods with the impluse drive either being attached of the back of the pods, or FAST pack-style ventral or dorsal mount on the rear inboard wing-fuselage section; Impulse-fusion turbines replacing the jet turbines and either aerodynamic warp nacelles mounted on the inboard wing section or a warp nacelle pod based on the D-21 drone.
--Rod.H
Reply


Messages In This Thread
starship ratings - by A117 - 09-15-2005, 08:57 AM
Re: starship ratings - by Valles - 09-15-2005, 09:14 AM
Re: starship ratings - by Rod.H - 09-15-2005, 11:13 AM
Re: starship ratings - by WengFook - 09-16-2005, 04:47 AM
Re: starship ratings - by A117 - 09-16-2005, 07:26 AM
Re: starship ratings - by WengFook - 09-16-2005, 10:56 AM
Re: starship ratings - by drakensis - 09-16-2005, 11:00 AM
Re: starship ratings - by Rod.H - 09-16-2005, 12:51 PM
Star Fleet Battles - by hmelton - 09-16-2005, 04:47 PM
Re: Star Fleet Battles - by ClassicDrogn - 09-16-2005, 05:41 PM
Re: Star Fleet Battles - by Rod.H - 09-16-2005, 06:57 PM
starfleet SR-71 - by hmelton - 09-16-2005, 10:39 PM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by ClassicDrogn - 09-16-2005, 11:29 PM
SR- 71 with starfleet technology - by hmelton - 09-17-2005, 02:43 AM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by Rod.H - 09-17-2005, 05:24 AM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by ClassicDrogn - 09-17-2005, 06:56 AM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by Rod.H - 09-17-2005, 07:52 AM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by ClassicDrogn - 09-17-2005, 11:47 AM
Re: starfleet SR-71 - by WengFook - 09-17-2005, 09:42 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)