Ankhani Wrote:Including "Entertaining" as an additional "or" criteria for acceptable comments will likely be problematic.Oh, I'm certain it will be problematic. Policy, like programming, is a game of choosing which problems you want to have. In this case, it's a question of whether it's a bigger problem if people feel like they can't express themselves on the wiki, or if they express themselves too much in stupid ways.
robkelk Wrote:As long as you don't set a policy in stone, you can change it later...I'd say it's safe to assume that very little will be set in stone. However, it is important that we get things right early on, because we're going to have a major competitor.
I think that there's some advantage to be had by modeling the new site on the earlier, community-oriented wikis like Ward's Wiki, and letting TVT develop towards the Wikipedia-style information-and-bureaucracy model. But I don't want that to be imposed from the top, so I have to ask what would be a bridge too far.
-- ∇×V