It's the same index. What I start with are files named Main.Badass and
Music.TinyTim, and links to BadAss and Music/TinyTim in the document.
Both of them need to be rewritten to "Badass" and "Tiny Tim (Music)"
(actually "[[Tiny Tim (Music)|Tiny Tim]" in the link case). But in
either case, it's a matter of looking up the rewritten name in an index
for what the new file name is.
Remember, the same logo doesn't have to look good at 16x16 -- Wikipedia uses the letter "W", Google uses a "G", EPU uses just the "E". Heck, our name is ATT, we could just use a Death Star at 16x16.
![[Image: Wiki_Logo?sendfile=true;file=bikelogo.png]](http://daviswiki.org/Wiki_Logo?sendfile=true;file=bikelogo.png)
But Google's approach is the correct one: establish a brand identity, and then vary it on occasion. Every once in a while, completely change it, so you can have fun and get some word-of-mouth publicity for your site.
I'm not ready to make up my mind on the logo, since I'm more
concerned about the text data import. Everyone's opinions are probably
going to be the major deciding factor.
-- ∇×V
Music.TinyTim, and links to BadAss and Music/TinyTim in the document.
Both of them need to be rewritten to "Badass" and "Tiny Tim (Music)"
(actually "[[Tiny Tim (Music)|Tiny Tim]" in the link case). But in
either case, it's a matter of looking up the rewritten name in an index
for what the new file name is.
Quote:I hope no one minds a lurker butting in, but I had a submission for aWelcome lurkers! I knew there had to be a few out there. I like it, but it gives me the vague feeling that there should be a large green leaf in the background. Not that this is a bad thing.
logo design that's been simmering in my brainpan for quite awhile now. I
*think* it meets all the design guidelines, as I've seen written so
far, and is at least halfway memorable...
...sort of a 60s Mod/Art Nouveau type pastiche, among other things. Any thoughts or criticisms?
![[Image: atttranslogofin_zpsdb20297f.png]](http://i950.photobucket.com/albums/ad350/ranchoth/atttranslogofin_zpsdb20297f.png)
Remember, the same logo doesn't have to look good at 16x16 -- Wikipedia uses the letter "W", Google uses a "G", EPU uses just the "E". Heck, our name is ATT, we could just use a Death Star at 16x16.
Quote:I don't know if this is global or not, but I've just noticed that on atThis is intentional. The problem is that we're using the top level headers to separate out Anime/Live Action/* sections, and do section hiding with them. So it's a bit hard to present "Examples" in a way that's bigger than that. Unless... I make an examples template that acts kind of like a header. Hm, maybe I'll do that.
least some trope entries the horizontal rule + "Examples" header are
missing from between the main text and (naturally) the examples.
Quote:You know, assuming we can polish up some of the other images, why shouldOh, I've been through this dance before:
we limit ourselves to just one logo? We can do the Google Doodle
thing...
But Google's approach is the correct one: establish a brand identity, and then vary it on occasion. Every once in a while, completely change it, so you can have fun and get some word-of-mouth publicity for your site.
I'm not ready to make up my mind on the logo, since I'm more
concerned about the text data import. Everyone's opinions are probably
going to be the major deciding factor.
-- ∇×V