Posts: 1,382
	Threads: 33
	Joined: Sep 2007
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		Finished reading up the pdf:
Counts I (Misrepresentation/Deceit), II (Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices), VI (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) and VIII (Punitive Damages)  -- DISMISSED
Counts III (Defamation/Libel/Slander), IV (Negligence), V (Gross Negligence), and VII (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress) remain 'viable'
Here's to hoping they find a judge with some sense to consider these last few...
---
The Master said: "It is all in vain! I have never yet seen a man who can perceive his own faults and bring the charge home against himself."
>Analects: Book V, Chaper XXVI
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,964
	Threads: 305
	Joined: Jul 2010
	
Reputation: 
8
	 
	
	
		I couldn't find my copypasta of the Picard facepalm, though I truly believe it applies. 
Also, common sense from a judge? The law knows no common sense.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 8,933
	Threads: 386
	Joined: May 2006
	
Reputation: 
3
	 
	
	
		It happens, Dartz, and when it does there is always much rejoicing in the land.  Such as when they said it was legal to jailbreak stuff.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 749
	Threads: 53
	Joined: Dec 2004
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		Well, to be pedantic, that wasn't a judge on the jailbreaking issue, it was the Librarian of Congress.  Turns out the DMCA had a built-in provision that allows the LoC to review the DMCA every 3 years and write exceptions to it, without needing Congressional approval.  A rare flash of sanity from Capitol Hill.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
			CattyNebulart 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
	
 
	
	
		SkyeFire Wrote:Well, to be pedantic, that wasn't a judge on the jailbreaking issue, it was the Librarian of Congress.  Turns out the DMCA had a built-in provision that allows the LoC to review the DMCA every 3 years and write exceptions to it, without needing Congressional approval.
A seriously flawed provision since some of the exceptions lapse each time. Basicly there is this long and involved process to apply for an exemption and it must be done each time and each time it will be decided anew. In a few years it might no longer be legal to jailbreak phones, and so forth. I believe the exception for research has lapsed that way because it was too much effort to apply for it each time.
E: "Did they... did they just endorse the combination of the JSDF and US Army by showing them as two lesbian lolicons moving in together and holding hands and talking about how 'intimate' they were?"
B: "Have you forgotten so soon? They're phasing out Don't Ask, Don't Tell."