Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Move over, Klingon: Introducing Na'vi
 
#4
They DO go on there, don't they? And admittedly the transcription does require knowledge of a character set uncommon in the US. However, most European dictionaries are now using the IPA for their phonetic respellings...

Right off. I can give you a rough estimate on how to say some of the "complicated" sounds:

The "ejectives" [tx, px, kx] Put a lot of force behind t, p, or k, trying for a sound like, but not quite, a click of the tongue. Helps if you imagine a big puff of air being ejected .

The glottal stop, represented in Na'vi by the apostrophe is what we in English use at the hyphen in "uh-oh" or in certain British varieties use to replace "t" in "bottle"

"e" in written Na'vi is kind of like the "or" in Received Pronunciation/BBC English's version of "world."
"a" is like the a in Japanese or Italian
"รค" , with the umlaut, is like the a in General American's pronunciation of "cat"

Aheh, nvm just realized they've got a decent chart on the first page there.

It is rough, but then, it was mainly intended for actors, so everything is POSSIBLE to say by a human voice.

It may help to realize that Marc Okrand's Klingon Dictionary is about as difficult to grasp from a first-timer's perspective.
''We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat
them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.''

-- James Nicoll
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Move over, Klingon: Introducing Na'vi - by Foxboy - 12-26-2009, 03:06 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 12-26-2009, 10:27 AM
[No subject] - by sweno - 12-26-2009, 06:59 PM
[No subject] - by Foxboy - 12-26-2009, 07:23 PM
[No subject] - by Foxboy - 12-26-2009, 07:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)